About Hannah Smith
Hello! I'm Hannah Smith, a first-year student at Columbia University studying Mathematics and East Asian Languages and Cultures. My interests in diasporic communities and media have led me to conduct research on the differing portrayals of the Chinese-American immigration experience through history, literature, and film.
Recent Comments
Narrowing the scope of my research question has been the biggest challenge I have encountered so far. The field of virtue ethics that I am looking into is incredibly vast; countless individuals spanning thousands of years have dedicated their lives to contributing to the base of knowledge. Some of my background readings led me to a large number of areas that I found myself interested in. Despite my commitment to a well-reasoned, logical approach, I have taken a leap of faith to explore just one or two of those avenues. Philosophy, by etymology, is all about the big picture; I have found it to be quite different from work done in other disciplines within the humanities or STEM. With some guidance from my faculty advisor and graduate student mentor, I have been able to focus my work with greater precision.
The most useful resource is my faculty advisor. Without his knowledge, direction, and support it would be remarkably difficult for me to engage with my task as I am. Meeting with him regularly provides a litmus test for my ideas such that I can proceed with the ones that we find to be most worthy. I am incredibly grateful to have witnessed his intellectual fervor and voracity firsthand; it has inspired me to read and examine problems beyond the immediate scope of my work.
Sebastian, I had a similar issue with narrowing the scope of my research, and continually finding more things I was interested in. I think what you mentioned about talking with others such as your faculty/graduate student mentor was super important for me as well!
What new ideas, challenges, or other issues have you encountered with regard to your project (this might include data collection, information that contradicts your assumptions or the assertions of others, materials that have enriched your understanding of the topic or led you to change your project, etc.)? How have these ideas or challenges shaped the bigger picture of your research? Has the scope or focus of your topic changed since you began this project? If so, how?
One of the big challenges I encountered during my project was determining a proper scope for my research. I started off with a very broad focus, which was the relationship between Chinese immigration and literature and film. I was not able to find a lot of resources in terms of film and literature for the time period I was looking at, so I decided to change it to a later and longer period. Another change I made was that I was originally planning to look at multiple films and literature, but in the end I decided to do a more in depth analysis of a single film and bring in the ideas from my readings. Overall, the scope of my project changed in that the time period became longer but the bodies of work studied became less.
What research resources have proven particularly useful to you as you continue your research?
Reading bibliographies was a very helpful research tool for me. I highlighted many things I found interesting in books and articles that I read, and going back through and reading the sources where the information came from helped me figure out the similarities between things I highlighted. This ultimately helped me to narrow focus of my project and find what I was particularly interested in.
Some immediate expectations I have for my research are getting any travel plans set in stone & fully calibrating the telescope/fixing any bugs in the software. However, this is only seen as the first of two summers, the second of which my research group will travel to the South Pacific and take on-site radiation measurements. Here, I'll be able to capture celestial objects from the equator! At the end, I hope to produce a paper potentially accompanied by video documentaries from both summers.
My research matters because the data we're collecting next summer affects real populations. The question we're investigating is whether or not the radiation levels in food on Kiritimati Island (where nuclear testing was done post WW2) are higher than the regulated levels set by the International Commission (100 mrem/year). If there is, we'll be able to take action and potentially help future generations!
Erica, I really like the idea of a video documentary to accompany your research paper! I think that would be a great way to display what you’ve worked on in a more visual way than a paper would be able to show on its own.
For my final deliverable, I originally planned to write a research paper. However, I think it will be more feasible for me to write a film review. I need to do more research on what a formal film review looks like, but this style of writing will allow me to combine the books and articles about the time period that I have read with an evaluation of a specific film that I believe encapsulates my thesis. Eventually, I would like to write a more formal research paper on my topic as a part of a larger project, because there are many topics related to what I’m focusing on that I would like to look deeper into and bring together in a new way.
The question I am investigating is how films made during the Exclusion Era used portrayals of gender and sexuality to rationalize exclusionary policies towards Chinese Americans. This question is significant to study because it is important to understand how media can both reflect and create stereotypes about marginalized groups, as well as how this may influence the way that people perceive them. Being aware of how media, specifically films, can influence us in a political and social sense is important in combatting stereotypes we may be presented with.
In my work within a clinical setting focused on children and genetic testing, ethics play a central role. As a researcher, I want to encourage families to have their children participate in genetic testing that may provide them with crucial insights into their children's disorders, but also has the potential to boost our understanding of how pathogenic variants of certain genes impact children differently than adults. This information then can be used to improve treatments and interventions so that they can be tailored specifically for pediatric patients in the future. However, genetic testing presents ethical dilemmas for families, such as the potential discovery of a positive mutation that could adversely affect the child's ability to obtain health insurance and the psychological impact of such a finding. As a researcher, you must navigate this fine line carefully. It is imperative not to pressure families into participating in your study or pursuing a care path that may solely benefit your research. Instead, you must prioritize the well-being and autonomy of the families, ensuring they are fully informed and supported in making decisions that are best for their children. This ethical consideration is crucial in maintaining trust and integrity in your research and clinical practice.
While delving into the treatment of children with different types of cardiomyopathy at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, I discovered that providing tailored care to children with this diagnosis, rather than applying adult protocols, is a relatively new practice. This shift in care has been widely supported, with few dissenting viewpoints regarding the need to improve and adapt pediatric care. However, genetic testing in children raises ethical concerns, as these young patients may not fully comprehend the implications and are vulnerable in this regard. Despite this, genetic testing can be highly beneficial for their personal health, offering physicians a clearer understanding of the underlying causes of their symptoms, particularly in relation to their heart. Therefore, I consider the alternative viewpoint that views genetic testing for affected children in a negative light throughout my research, as I believe it keeps me grounded in my true goals and passions. The most crucial perspective in medicine is to see the patient as an individual in need of care, rather than as a research subject with the primary focus being on the dignity and well-being of the children. Having this perspective ensures that I will never be led astray by pushing children and their families down a path that benefits my research rather than their best interests.
Tatum, I think that your point about not pressuring people you are engaging with in a research context is super important, and relevant in the humanities as well! In documenting lesser-known history, personal accounts can be really valuable and contribute a lot towards research. However, it is essential to respect people’s boundaries and understand what they are willing and not willing to share, or what studies they are willing to participate in.
What are some of the ethical issues that you are grappling with in your research? What are some of the ways in which you are responding to these questions?
An ethical issue that has been important for me to consider is how my research topics still manifest themselves today, and being careful and cognizant of discussion of negative racial stereotypes and portrayals. For example, I have been reading a book on the practice of yellowface, or using makeup, costumes, and other props to imitate Asian people, specifically in the context of the period of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. Even though it may seem like these stereotypes are very outdated and we would never encounter them today, the author provides occasional examples of modern yellowface. This signified to me in the importance of taking care when discussing history, especially American, because it is all much more recent and relevant than we may think at first glance.
As you continue your research, have you considered alternative viewpoints in your investigation? If so, how have these alternative viewpoints enriched or changed your project?
So far when focusing on films, I have mostly been looking at negative portrayals of Chinese Americans in films made by white and European filmmakers. However, an alternative viewpoint that I am looking forward to exploring is how films made by Chinese Americans presented a differing response to the exclusionary policies of the time period. This will enrich my project by showing how film was not only a medium used for gatekeeping and exclusion, but that more nuanced stories by a variety of individuals were also told through film in this era. By exploring this alternative side of filmmaking, my project will be able to discuss multiple sides of the same historical time period and events, which is something I think is very important when conducting historical investigations.
I am working at a building that is affiliated with 3 different institutions: Columbia University, the New York State, and Presbyterian, a university, a government, and a hospital, which already shows the interdisciplinary attributes of research. Today, in fact, we had a floor-wide journal club, where the PIs, post-docs, and undergrads discussed a paper relevant to our work and how it related to mice behavioral work as whole. In this small way, I can clearly see the importance of communication and interdisciplinary innovation, especially in medicine. My contribution to this collaborative body is to study how early life stress, a great predictive factor for mental health, impacts movement and memory. This works goes hand-in-hand with studying the neurobiology—the neurotransmitters and receptors—and with clinical research—drug treatment. Outside of science, studying early life stress can be an avenue for advocacy, especially for children prone to experiencing stressful events in their childhood.
In terms of the Laidlaw cohort itself, I have learned so much in my conversations with my fellow scholars. I want to shoutout Justin for talking to me about his project about forgiveness. His research is a type of sociology/psychology research I have not encountered before, and it’s truly interesting how I can see the ways neuroscience can be applied to studying forgiveness.
Ultimately, our interdisciplinary perspectives can allow us to not only be more creative and innovative but it can also help us to be more compassionate as we think of the ways our research can benefit our field and beyond.
Tara, I really like how you brought in the idea of the physical building and its different affiliate institutions. I think this is a really interesting way to think about interdisciplinary research, because a lot of research happens because of funding from different organizations that are not always necessarily aligned with the same academic field or have the same exact goals. Your comment about creativity and innovation also connects to this, because when researchers come together and are provided with a larger wealth of resources, they are able to make great contributions to academia and society at large.
My project is interdisciplinary in and of itself, as I am looking at historical sources in comparison to film and literature. This will allow me to create a project that differs from other accounts of the same time period and historical events, as well as interacting with scholars from a variety of fields. In doing this, I hope to investigate the global challenge of how history is documented versus how individuals experienced it.
Despite the fact that my project is interdisciplinary, I felt at times that it lacked relevance. However, after hearing about other researchers’ projects, I was able to see that it can be tied to many fields, regardless of the time period or specific location that I am focusing on. For example, the study of immigration and assimilation has ties to sociology as well as human rights. Immigration is a very researched and debated issue today in many countries, and using the perspective of modern immigration policies could help me shape my research into something applicable to society today.
Overall, I think that having knowledge about other disciplines is necessary to facilitate communication and collaboration in academic fields. This can be done by simply asking others about their work and listening well, or from reading up on important developments in other disciplines. Without knowledge of the work of others, researchers and scholars cannot collaborate to create change.