My Project Outline: "Characterizing the SON Gene via CRISPR-Mediated Protein Tags"

Hello, everyone! I've put together an outline for my project- I tried to make this a sufficiently thorough explanation without being completely filled with confusing jargon. I'm proud of the work I've done, so I hope you all enjoy reading this little rundown. Let me know if you have any questions!
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Title: 

“Characterizing the SON Gene via CRISPR-Mediated Protein Tags”

Abstract: 

Recent research has indicated that the spatial organization of the nucleus plays a critical role in gene expression and disease pathology. Yet the fundamental logic underlying this process is still poorly understood. A number of membraneless organelles within the nucleus are thought to be involved in gene expression, working together in a complex assembly to conduct functions like splicing and transcription. 

One particular type of substructure in this category– those being nuclear speckles –appear to be integral to the organization of the aforementioned nuclear architecture. The SON protein is now widely thought to be central to this architecture, being a critical participant in the RNA splicing process (wherein immature RNA has unneeded sections removed before the final transcript is translated into protein form). However, its in vivo dynamics and functional contributions are still largely uncharacterized.

This project aims to directly visualize the activity of SON protein in live HepG2 cells. This goal will be achieved by tagging the SON locus with a fluorescent HaloTag protein, through a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in. Single-guide RNA molecules (“sgRNAs”) will target complementary sites near the SON gene; concurrently, homology-directed repair (HDR) templates containing the HaloTag sequence will be spliced into the targeted region. Two separate HDR templates will be used, respectively using microhomology-mediated and nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair techniques (MMEJ and NHEJ). 

Successfully modified cells will be selected via puromycin treatment and genetic sequencing. The primary functional analysis of modified cells will be fluorescence microscopy, with the goal of investigating the localization patterns of SON protein through in vivo examination. If time permits, a secondary aim is to implement a protein tag degradation system, investigating the functional necessity of SON in maintaining nuclear speckle integrity. This experiment’s conclusions may ultimately contribute to our scientific understanding of the relationships between nuclear architecture and gene expression patterns.

Research Question: “What is the role of SON protein in organizing and regulating the activity of membraneless nuclear organelles?”

Background:

Eukaryotic gene expression– the process through which information in the genome is used to generate RNA transcripts, and ultimately functional proteins –is heavily reliant on the precise coordination of transcription and pre-mRNA splicing. This complex interplay is governed by the spliceosome; this is a dynamic complex of ribonucleoproteins which assemble to remove unwanted regions (introns) and connect the desired regions (exons) in immature RNA transcripts (Sharma et al., 2011). Among the membraneless organelles that cooperate to form the spliceosome are the nuclear speckles, irregular domains enriched in spliceosome motifs like SR proteins and long noncoding RNAs. 

Research has shown these speckles to behave as central hubs coordinating multiple phases of gene expression: storage and modification of splicing factors, recruitment of said factors to transcription sites, and organization of pre-mRNA processing (Morimoto and Boerkoel, 2013). SON protein, according to recent findings, is one of the primary scaffolding proteins maintaining the structure of these nuclear speckles. Defects in or depletion of SON have resulted in chaotic dispersion of speckle proteins, impaired localization of splicing factors, and other related defects in the splicing process (Lu et al., 2014).

While some research has been done in recent years on the precise relationship between SON and gene expression, much of this research has made use of methodologies like plasmid overexpression– methods which may provide a less accurate picture of natural protein function (Roberts et al., 2017). Labeling SON with an endogenous protein tag via CRISPR editing provides a higher-fidelity method of observing SON’s localization and functionality over time. Additionally, if the inducible degradation arm of this project is to be pursued, that would be an opportunity to further evaluate SON’s necessity for the integrity and functionality of nuclear speckle proteins.

Works cited:

Morimoto M, Boerkoel CF. “The role of nuclear bodies in gene expression and disease”. Biology (Basel). 2013 Jul 9;2(3):976-1033. doi: 10.3390/biology2030976.

Lu X, Ng HH, et al. “The Role of SON in Splicing, Development, and Disease.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, vol. 5, no. 5, 2014.

Roberts B, Haupt A, et al. (2017). “Systematic gene tagging using CRISPR/Cas9 in human stem cells to illuminate cell organization”. MBoC. https://doi.org/10.1101/123042

Sharma A, Takata H, et al. "Son maintains accurate splicing for a subset of human pre-mRNAs". J Cell Sci. 2011 Dec 15;124(Pt 24):4286–4298. doi:10.1242/jcs.087775. 


Methodology:

Note: Methodology may be subject to minor changes depending on time and resources available; mentors will be consulted as necessary.

  1. Split HepG2 cells from stock culture; begin basic maintenance procedures (replenishing medium, passaging periodically, etc.)
  2. Thaw prepared plasmid mixtures containing Cas9 as well as cloned sgRNAs and donor oligonucleotides; these mixtures should correspond with the NHEJ and MMEJ repair mechanisms respectively.
  3. Send plasmid mixtures for Plasmidsaurus sequencing; compare to reference sequences on Benchling database to confirm components are correctly-identified and ready for splicing.
  4. Split cultured HepG2 cells; transfect with sgRNA/oligo mixture via lipofectamine procedure.
  5. Check for successful transfection via puromycin screening; sequence to confirm success, and expand clones in new dishes for further investigation.
  6. Perform fluorescence microscopy on transfectants, investigating localization patterns of GFP-tagged SON protein. Optionally (depending on time available), perform additional knockout analysis based on protein tag degradation of modified SON protein.

Potential Impact:

The exact physical dynamics of nuclear speckles, and their precise functions as regards transcriptional regulation, continue to evade scientific understanding; this project cannot singlehandedly illuminate these unknown areas. However, the methodology and conclusions of this experiment could serve to substantively inform future research into the questions of subnuclear organization. The protein tagging strategy I’m employing provides a model method of investigating the architecture of nuclear organelles with minimal disruption to natural cell physiology. The repercussions of employing the DNA repair strategies of MMEJ and NHEJ in parallel could facilitate many future CRISPR-splicing-based experiments. And the possible extension of this project focusing on SON knockout through protein-tag degradation (which I will continue to research in this lab, regardless of whether or not I have the time to during this summer), could shed light on the unexplored role of SON protein in RNA splicing, and perhaps transcriptional regulation as a whole.  

Resources & Support Needed:

Throughout this whole process, I’ll be relying on the feedback of a number of mentors and fellow researchers to ensure I’m applying newly-learned skills correctly (principally my PI, Dr. Sreejith Nair, and my postdoctoral colleague, Dr. Shravan Girada). In terms of physical materials I’m relying on, I’ll need to acquire pre-prepared CRISPR templates from my colleague Xinrui Wei, as well as viable HepG2 cells for transfection purposes from my colleague Weiyi Guo.



Please sign in

If you are a registered user on Laidlaw Scholars Network, please sign in