While ostensibly my research is about primary care access for older adults in New York Chinatowns, there is a dual nature to my investigations as part of the Laidlaw program this summer. 

Before beginning the research period, I underestimated how much additional time would be spent looking into the process of research itself. While I’m focused on setting up my literature review, I’ve been equally involved with trying to form a holistic understanding of what research truly is. Laidlaw is my first big opportunity to conduct research. As such, the past few weeks have involved simultaneous investigations; one into the structural and social determinants of healthy aging for Chinatown older adults  and the other about research in general. 

Just as I’m orienting myself to the existing literature, history, and culture of what I’m studying, I am also getting acquainted with the general research process. Just as much as I’m reading up on the history of Chinatown, I am also investigating and learning about ethical research practices, different study design methods, and ways to analyze my data. 

Under the incredible guidance of my mentor, Dr. Paris Adkins-Jackson (Dr. AJ!), I’ve been lucky enough to learn about the process of inquiry while also constructing my own study and putting into practice the principles I am being taught. At this stage in my research, I still have more questions than answers; but at the same time I’ve found incredible meaning in being able to execute this project under principles of ethical decision making, genuine curiosity, and storytelling as a way to make change.