Research Poster - WHEN CATEGORIES BECOME CLINICAL JUDGEMENTS: Investigating the effects of categorical thinking on misconceptions and stigma surrounding Sickle Cell Disease in UK healthcare
Research Poster -
WHEN CATEGORIES BECOME CLINICAL JUDGEMENTS: Investigating the effects of categorical thinking on misconceptions and stigma surrounding Sickle Cell Disease in UK healthcare
Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects over 19,000 people in the UK, yet genotype labels (HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β-thal) are often treated as fixed predictors of severity and pain, at times overriding the individualised assessment clinical guidelines like NICE CG143 actually call for. This poster traces that gap: from diagnostic essentialism to stereotyping to real clinical consequences, drawing on comparative NHS funding data and actual patient case examples. The alternative I have proposed is: care that takes into account the intersectionality of SCD, that is built on genotype, modifiers, environment, history, and current symptoms, not category alone.

I have also created a thematic literature review to accompany this poster, drawing on a broader range of source types such as, peer-reviewed clinical literature, sociological accounts of stigma, patient advocacy reports, and NHS system data to build out the categorical thinking argument in full. This will be uploaded separately.