Journal Entry: Research Summer Week 1

This post is a reflection on the first week of the research summer. Given that it has only been a week, it's difficult to extract too much of a narrative from my experience so far, but overall I think it's been great and we've made concrete steps towards an outcome I am excited to materialise. 
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

One thing that went well was that significant progress was made in being placed in a group and getting to know the team I am in. We were able to carry out research to create a literature map of the field we are working in. I am proud of having begun my contribution in a project that will have a substantive, real world impact. The most important factors contributing to our success so far was our ability within the team to communicate clearly, break our goals down into smaller, actionable steps and delegate responsibility so that we are able to progress towards our aims in a clear, systematic manner. Overall, what stood out to me as having gone well was our team's ability to construct and execute a clear, streamlined workflow.

One thing that could be improved was that, at the beginning of the week, there was a small mishap that resulted from confusing regarding what each member of the team thought the end goal was. Although the issue was resolved very quickly and was of no consequence, a lesson for the future is to be crystal clear in outlining what the overarching objective for a project is and ensuring that everyone is on the same page from day one. 

The main interaction that stood out for this week was the first meeting. It became clear quickly that when placed within a team to work towards a project, getting to know the team on friendly terms seamlessly is an important factor in enabling a productive work environment. My first contribution this week included part-taking in literature overview to grasp what the ecosystem looks like within our area of research. My second contribution this week was to create a flow-chart to clearly visualise our workflow and timeline for the project, such that the steps we will take towards our objectives are layered in actionable steps and in correct chronological order. 

One behavioural adjustment I will make is to play my role in the communal responsibility of ensuring clarity of the conclusions we arrive at in meetings. Each meeting should end with a clear set of conclusions that is understood by each member of the team. This requires positive, constructive communication and the attentiveness required to make sure that everyone is happy and on the same page regarding where we are at with the project. A concrete action would be to take minutes in meetings, and clearly lay-out conclusions and next steps for everyone to access and comment on.

Please sign in

If you are a registered user on Laidlaw Scholars Network, please sign in

Go to the profile of Benjamin Margetts
18 days ago

Bora, this is a carefully considered reflection that highlights several important strengths, particularly your focus on organisation, communication, and creating structures that help a team work effectively together. The emphasis you place on breaking complex goals into manageable steps and ensuring clarity around objectives will be a real asset as your project develops.

I was especially pleased to read about your reflection on the early misunderstanding around the project's end goal. Recognising the importance of shared understanding and taking responsibility for improving team communication demonstrates both self-awareness and leadership. Your proposed solution around recording key decisions and action points is practical and will help support effective collaboration throughout the project.

As your research progresses, I would encourage you to continue building on the literature review and theory-mapping work by engaging closely with the central questions of Brief 6. While understanding the enrichment ecosystem is important, the project's core focus is on how evidence relating to enrichment, character development, wellbeing, belonging and pupil development becomes translated into educational policy and reform discussions. The most compelling insights are likely to emerge from examining the relationship between research evidence, policy legitimacy, stakeholder perspectives, and theory-of-change development. 

Your interest in creating visual frameworks and workflows could be particularly valuable here. Brief 6 explicitly highlights theory of change as a key area of investigation, and there may be opportunities to apply your strengths in mapping processes to understanding how enrichment activities connect to developmental outcomes and, ultimately, to policy influence. 

I also encourage you, as stakeholder engagement and interviews begin, to think critically about the different forms of evidence that policymakers, practitioners and researchers find persuasive. Understanding these different perspectives sits at the heart of the brief and could help your team make a meaningful contribution to wider discussions about educational success beyond attainment-focused measures. 

You have made a very positive start, and it's encouraging to see such a strong focus on teamwork, communication and continuous improvement. I look forward to seeing how your team's work develops from building an understanding of the field towards producing evidence-informed insights and recommendations for policy and practice. Keep up the excellent work.