Research Poster: Where There's Fire, There's Smoke: Correlating Wildfire Activity with PM2.5 In Los Angeles, California and Jakarta, Indonesia

Thank you so much to my mentor, Dr. Song Gao, for his invaluable guidance throughout this project. I would also like to express my gratitude towards the Laidlaw Scholars Foundation and the Georgetown University Laidlaw Scholars Programme for their support of my research.
Research Poster: Where There's Fire, There's Smoke: Correlating Wildfire Activity with PM2.5 In Los Angeles, California and Jakarta, Indonesia

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Wildfire activity is an increasing environmental and public health concern, as wildfire smoke
releases fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) that can adversely affect respiratory and other health
outcomes. This study investigates the relationship between wildfire activity and ambient PM₂.₅
concentrations in Los Angeles County and Jakarta, Indonesia. Fire activity was measured using
fire radiative power from NASA’s NOAA-21 satellite and correlated with daily average PM2.5
measurements from EPA and OpenAQ ground monitors. For each monitor-day, wildfire activity
was calculated using fire detections within a 25-km radius of the PM₂.₅ monitor, including total
number of fires, total FRP, and distance-weighted FRP. In Los Angeles, the strongest relationship
between wildfire activity and ambient PM₂.₅ was observed for the total number of fire detections
within 25 km of the three monitors closest to the Palisades Fire, with a statistically significant
positive correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.4985, R² = 0.2485, p = 2.21 × 10⁻³⁶). In comparison,
correlations between wildfire activity metrics and ambient PM₂.₅ were substantially weaker in
Jakarta, suggesting that wildfire activity accounted for less of the observed variation in ambient
PM₂.₅ in Jakarta than in Los Angeles. These findings demonstrate that regional differences lead
to different sources of ambient PM2.5 and further research is needed to determine the health
effects of wildfire-specific PM2.5.