Field Journal: Week 3

Field Journal: Week 3
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

How have the workshops and discussions on leadership this week changed your understanding of what leadership means?

The leadership workshop this week was extremely insightful and allowed me to recognize how leadership is truly a behavior not simply a title. Initially as we were taking the survey trying to identify what type of social style (driver, amiable, analytical, or expressive) we have a tendency towards I wondered how a leader could possess all these traits simultaneously or if one would just hope the group had people with different dominant social styles. However, through the workshop I was able to understand how leadership is about maintaining balance. Even through the case study, we saw how people often gravitate towards extremes. Rowan desired quick action and decisiveness while Ellis shut down due to an absence of careful planning and deliberating. A leader must identify these extremes within each person or even the group as a whole and bring attention to the need for balance. Each one of these social styles or approaches are valuable and some situations may need one more than another. The quality of a leader involves being able to put their own tendencies aside to meet the needs and goals of the group as a whole. Rather than being a perfectly well rounded person who is equal parts driver, amiable, analytical,, leaders must be flexible and willing to play the role, whether or not it is the approach they typically use, that is most needed for the group.

How might you imagine applying one model of leadership during your Laidlaw summer on campus—either within the Laidlaw cohort or beyond this community? While we often associate leadership and leaders with seniority, how might leadership be modeled among individuals who are among the youngest people on campus (i.e. you!)?

I think the approach that most aligns with my role in the lab as I conduct my research is analytical. By continuously striving to learn, practice, and grow, I can meaningfully contribute to the scholarly conversation surrounding social memory through my novel experiment. This curiosity and passion is necessary for leadership as it is what breakthroughs and discoveries stem from. Leadership may seem more outright with seniority, but underclassman have countless opportunities to demonstrate leadership behavior by bringing new perspectives, approaches, and talents to a group dynamic. You must take the initiative and the possible risk to share your ideas while being receptive to others' thoughts, even encouraging those around you to offer their insights.

Please sign in

If you are a registered user on Laidlaw Scholars Network, please sign in

Go to the profile of Evalina Sain
about 2 hours ago

Hi Phoebe, 

I enjoyed reading your points about balancing all traits as a leader and not allowing categorization to dictate leadership style, but instead understanding that a leader adapts to a group's needs and assumes the role needed, filling gaps rather than just fading into their comfort zone.

I had similar thoughts throughout the workshop—that a leader, although possessing their own strengths, must be versatile enough to, as you put it, "play the role" regardless of what it may be.

Go to the profile of Van Muller
18 minutes ago

Hi Phoebe!

I really appreciated your insights about practicing leadership in a research setting. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment that a leader is someone who brings new approaches to a research space, encouraging others to look at a problem from various angles and that risk-taking is essential to new and exciting research.