Poster - Citizen Science in River Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review of the Whys and How's

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Babiso, W.Z.; Ayano, K.K.; Haile, A.T.; Keche, D.D.; Acharya, K.; Werner, D. Citizen Science for Water Quality Monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: Quality Assurance and Comparison with Conventional Methods. Water 2023, 15, 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020238.

Buytaert, W.; Zulkafli, Z.; Grainger, S.; Acosta, L.; Alemie, T.C.; Bastiaensen, J.; et al. Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Front. Earth Sci. 2014, 2, 26.

CESAM. citaqua – a citizen science approach for freshwater quality monitoring at estarreja city. Available online: https://www.cesam-la.pt/projetos/citaqua-a-citizen-science-approach-for-freshwater-quality-monitoring-at-estarreja-city/ (accessed on 18 July 2024).

Conrad, C.C.; Hilchey, K.G. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 176, 273–291.

Dickson, A.; Belmer, N.; Denshire, A.; Garland, I.; Lennox, S.; Ruming, S.; Lawler, D.; Wethered, A. Can citizen science inform science? Evaluating the results of the Bellingen Riverwatch citizen science program and a complimentary government monitoring program. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1237580.

Edmonson, C. The Role That Volunteer Monitoring Plays In Watershed Planning and An Evaluation of the USDA Stream Visual Assessment Protocol In the Booker Creek Watershed. 2004. https://doi.org/10.17615/hjqh-mr58.

Fehri, R.; Khlifi, S.; Vanclooster, M. Testing a citizen science water monitoring approach in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 104, 67–72.

Ferede, M.; Haile, A.; Walker, D.; Gowing, J.; Parkin, G. Multi-method groundwater recharge estimation at Eshito micro-watershed, Rift Valley Basin in Ethiopia. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2020, 65, 10.

Gowan, C.; Ruby, M.; Knisley, R.; Grimmer, L. Stream Monitoring Methods Suitable for Citizen Volunteers Working in the Coastal Plain and Lower Piedmont Regions of Virginia. Am. Entomol. 2007, 53, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/53.1.48.

Grantz, E.; Haggard, B.E. Informing volunteer water quality monitoring program design and watershed planning: Case study of StreamSmart data analysis in the Upper White River Basin, Arkansas. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 2022, 177, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2022.3380.x.

Herman-Mercer, N.; Antweiler, R.; Wilson, N.; Mutter, E.; Toohey, R.; Schuster, P. Embedded assessment as an essential method for understanding public engagement in citizen science. Citizen Sci. Theory Pract. 2018, 3, https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.123.

Ho, S.Y.; Xu, S.J.; Lee, F.W. Citizen science: An alternative way for water monitoring in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238349.

Krabbenhoft, C.A.; Kashian, D.R. Citizen science data are a reliable complement to quantitative ecological assessments in urban rivers. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 116, 106476.

Lane, S.N.; Odoni, N.; Landström, C.; Whatmore, S.J.; Ward, N.; Bradley, S. Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2015, 17, 704–727.

Lamberth, C.; Hughes, J.M. Physical Variables in Freshwater Ecosystems. In Freshwater Ecology and Conservation; Hughes, J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 106–132.

López-Bosch, D.; Blanch, E.; Páramo, F.; Flaquer, C.; Lopez-Baucells, A. What you hear may not be what you see: Potential of citizen science methods to use bats as riverine forest quality indicators. River Res. Appl. 2023, 40, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4211.

Marchant, R.; Yule, C.M. Aquatic Macroinvertebrates. In Freshwater Ecology and Conservation; Hughes, J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 240–256.

Mgoba, S.A.; Kabote, S.J. Effectiveness of participatory monitoring and evaluation on achievement of community-based water projects in Tanzania. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 200.

Mengist, W.; Soromessa, T.; Feyisa, G.L. Method for Conducting Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis for Environmental Science Research. MethodsX 2019, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777.

Middleton, J.V. The Stream Doctor Project: Community-Driven Stream Restoration. BioScience 2001, 51, 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0293:TSDPCD]2.0.CO;2.

Miguel-Chinchilla, L.; Heasley, E.; Loiselle, S.; Thornhill, I. Local and landscape influences on turbidity in urban streams: A global approach using citizen scientists. Freshw. Sci. 2019, 38, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/703397.

Murindahabi, M.M.; Hoseni, A.; Vreugdenhil, L.C.; et al. Citizen science for monitoring the spatial and temporal dynamics of malaria vectors in relation to environmental risk factors in Ruhuha, Rwanda. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 453. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03989-4.

Njue, N.; Gräf, J.; Weeser, B.; Rufino, M.C.; Breuer, L.; Jacobs, S.R. Monitoring of suspended sediments in a tropical forested landscape with citizen science. Front. Water 2021, 3, 656770.

Olson, C.M. Mixed methods evaluation of a stream monitoring citizen science program [Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University]. Oklahoma State University ShareOK Repository. 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/339033.

Pacini, N.; Pechar, L.; Harper, D.M. Chemical Determinants of Freshwater Ecosystem Functioning. In Freshwater Ecology and Conservation; Hughes, J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 89–102.

Ramírez, B.S.; van Meerveld, I.; Seibert, J. Citizen science approaches for water quality measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 897, 165436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165436.

Scotti, A.; Marsoner, T.; Vanek, M. A biodiversity monitoring program for macroinvertebrates inhabiting streams and rivers of South Tyrol (Italy): Aims, methodologies, and publicly accessible dataset. Data Brief 2022, 45, 108648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108648.

Silvano, R.A.M.; Hallwass, G. Engaging stakeholders to define and implement data needs for integrated decision support in coastal marine spatial planning. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114487.

Von Gönner, J.; Bowler, D.E.; Gröning, J.; Klauer, A.K.; Liess, M.; Neuer, L.; Bonn, A. Citizen science for assessing pesticide impacts in agricultural streams. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159607.

Water Rangers. Community Water Lab. Available online: https://waterrangers.com/community-water-lab/?v=79cba1185463 (accessed on 18 July 2024).

Wilson, N.J.; Mutter, E.; Inkster, J.; Satterfield, T. Community-Based Monitoring as the practice of Indigenous governance: A case study of Indigenous-led water quality monitoring in the Yukon River Basin. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 210, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.020.

Wessex Rivers Trust & Earthwatch. Wessex Rivers Trust Earthwatch Microplastics Monitoring Pilot Project. Available online: https://www.ninevehtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Wessex-Rivers-Trust-Earthwatch-Microplastics-Monitoring-Pilot-Project-min.pdf (accessed on 18 July 2024).

Please sign in

If you are a registered user on Laidlaw Scholars Network, please sign in