Invisible Identities: How For Women Scotland Unintentionally Argues for Legal Decertification of Sex/Gender

This paper looks at the inconsistencies highlighted by the Supreme Court in "For Women Scotland" between the GRA and the EA and whether these justify the conclusions of interpretation that were reached, and alternative ways of combatting these inconsistencies outside of statutory interpretation.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Please sign in

If you are a registered user on Laidlaw Scholars Network, please sign in